Posted by James on 16th December 2009

Bendcrete Submitted Park Designs

Here we go, Bendcretes submitted park designs. Doesn’t seem to have a jump box which a lot of people will hate, I quite like the wallrides, what do you guys think?. I don’t normally bother putting the spec in the post, but as a special Christmas treat here it is. Apparently this was a quick turn around and they are happy to modify if needs be.

09619-D2_Iso1_Kings-Field 09619-D2_Iso_Kings-Field 09619-D2_PK_Kings-Field

1: Vert Quarter Pipe: 2.850m High, 3m Wide.
2: Quarter Pipe: 1.5m High, 7.2m Wide.
3: Spine: 1.5m High, 8.4m Wide.
4: Roll-in: 0.3m high 2.4m Wide.
5: Quarter Pipe: 1.5m High, 6.8m Wide.
6: Flat Bank: 1.5m High, 25 degree, 4.8m Wide.
7: Quarter Pipe: 1.5m High, 4.8m Wide.
8:Curved Grind Block: 0.35m High.
9:Flat Bank: 0.5m High,1.2m Wide, 15 degree, Grind Block:0.35m High.
10:Manual Pad: 0.3m & 0.8m High, 1.5m Wide.
11:Flat Bank: 1m High, 2m Wide, 20 degree.
12:Decending Block: 0.65m High, 0.4m High.
13:Euro Gap: 0.7m High Bank, 0.3m High Step, 3.15m Wide.
14:Decending Tubular Rail: 0.7m High, 3.2m Long.
15:Decending Block: 0.5m High, 0.25m Wide.
16: Flat Bank: 1m High, 1.2m Wide, 20 degree.
17: Decending Block: 0.4m & 0.55m High, 0.6m Wide.
18:Steps x 4: 0.6m High, 1m Wide.
19:Flat Bank: 0.4m High, 2.2m Wide.
20:Flat Bank: 0.6m High, 1.2m Wide.
21: Decending Tubular Rail: 0.52m High.
22: Decending Tubular Rail: 0.45m High, 1.75m Long.
23:Decending Block: 0.42m High, 0.4m Wide.
24:Quarter Hip: 1.5m High, 2.4m Wide.
25:Rolled Over Bowled Quarter: 1.2m High.
26:Driveway/ Hex Pyramid: 0.45m High.
27:Grind Block: 0.45m High, 0.4m Wide.
28: Rollin: 1.2m High, 0.9m Wide.
29: Bowled/ Hipped Quarter: 1.2m High.
30: Bowled/ Hipped Quarter: 1.5m High. Curved/Wall Ride :1.2m High.
31: Driveway/ Pyramid: 0.6m High, 4.8m Wide.

You may be interested in:

15 Comments

  • At 2009.12.16 22:05, Kev said:

    Holy Shit! Andy went sick!

    • At 2009.12.16 22:13, sam said:

      wow. literally has everthing you could want.

      • At 2009.12.16 22:23, bailey said:

        looks amazing.

        • At 2009.12.16 22:39, Gareth said:

          Still think Maverick and Gravity are in the lead, this is ok but on a busy day would be a nightmare.

          • At 2009.12.16 22:53, dave! said:

            agree, dont wanna do that hip an hit some skateboarder mincing on the flat bank.

            • At 2009.12.16 22:58, will said:

              looks ok but looking at stuff like most of the quarters are 1.2m high seems like itll all be really small maybe?

              • At 2009.12.16 23:03, will said:

                1.5m rather

                • At 2009.12.17 08:10, Gareth said:

                  agreed, spine needs to be at least 5ft to be worthwhile and there needs to be some big quarters in there

                  • At 2009.12.17 09:31, James said:

                    1.5 metres = 4.92125984 feet

                    I think a 6ft mini is the best way to go.. and a jumpbox

                    • At 2009.12.17 11:51, Ax said:

                      Im still not feeling this one, doesn’t flow as well as the maverick. Also maverick plans just seem better organised, maybe still some tweaks, but overall i’d vote maverick.

                      • At 2009.12.17 11:58, James said:

                        Have you seen the Gravity ones? Seems like everyone is going with Maverick without taking the time to look elsewhere. I reckon its as Gareth says, toss up between Gravity and Maverick, still this ones not that bad.

                        • At 2009.12.17 18:02, Mike said:

                          i think mavric and this design are the best so far if we get a jump box on this design then it would be kl plus add other foot or so on each ramp. i honestly thing this park will be much better to handle busy times cos you have at least 3 main sections which should be kl.

                          • At 2009.12.17 18:04, Mike said:

                            If you change 31 from a driveway to a box then its perfect!

                            • At 2009.12.18 09:28, Bendcrete said:

                              Delighted you like the Bendcrete design and we can of course make changes to the design to ensure that you are getting what you want. We have tried to create different areas to suit the different wheeled sports and have avoided bowls as these restrict the number of riders in busy periods.

                              • At 2009.12.19 15:48, Digitalbmx.com » Skatepark Vote said:

                                [...] skate park based on the presentations and finalised designs provided by the following companies: Bendcrete Fearless Gravity Maverick Wheelscape From Monday 21st December you are asked to speak to Steve at [...]

                                (Required)
                                (Required, will not be published)